Exploring the Concept of Value for Money Assessment in Sierra Leone’S Public Procurement System
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2018-07
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Procurement is a key consideration in the management of public funds, and this function
accounts for roughly 70% of the yearly total budget of Sierra Leone. Though procurement has
not neglected its statutory responsibility of providing for the logistics needs of the
government, it is well noting that it has not contributed Value for Money (VFM) to the
projects delivered. Basically, VFM is the optimum combination of the whole life cost,
benefits, risks, quantity and quality of the goods, works and services provided embracing the
facilities management and environmental impact factors to achieve the desired outcome.
On this note, the aim of this research is to understand the Value for Money assessment concept
in the public procurement system of Sierra Leone. To achieve the aim of the research, the
researcher formulated four (4) research objectives which includes: defining Value for Money
in the context of Sierra Leone’s public procurement system; identifying the methods used in
conducting VFM assessment; determining the relationships between the methods and the
VFM they assess; and determining the procurement stages for optimal application of these
methods.
Value for Money assessment focuses on measuring economy, efficiency and effectiveness,
considering the different options available for the delivery of projects. Furthermore, it takes
account of adeptness in design, delivery, the use and management of the delivered project.
This process (if thoroughly) executed helps government to decide on the project(s) which
contribute(s) best value to its citizens.
The choice of the research was mixed methods and deductive in nature. Data was collected
using both questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The questionnaire survey targeted
the procurement and finance officers in the twenty-five (25) ministries situated in Freetown;
whereas the interviews were targeted at procurement experts who have successfully delivered
procurement projects to understand the VFM assessment concept.
The study revealed that practitioners in Sierra Leone defined Value for Money as the lowest
evaluated responsive bid which meets the specification of the user department, environmental
and social benefits, taking into account economy, efficiency, effectiveness and the whole life
cost of the procurement project. In addition, it was evidenced that practitioners considered
economy, efficiency and effectiveness in their VFM assessment. The methods mostly used in
VFM assessments are prior review, post review, contract monitoring, audit, national
competitive bidding, international competitive bidding, restricted bidding, request for
quotations and cost utility analysis. Findings revealed positively weak associations between
cost utility analysis, cost efficiency analysis and social return on investment analysis and the
three (3) elements of economy, efficiency and effectiveness. Also, the findings indicated weak
positive associations between the pre-contract stage, contracting and contract management
stage and post contact stage and the VFM methods. The study recommended that authorities
institutionalise the VFM assessment concept, adopt the methods, provide VFM assessment
training to enhance the capacity of practitioners to contribute VFM to public contracts and
include VFM assessment concept in the procurement act.
Description
A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING TECHNOLOGY, COLLEGE OF ART AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY IN PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT