Browsing by Author "Afukaar Francis"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    On-site personal protective equipment signage and use by road construction workers in Ghana: a comparative study of foreign and locally-owned companies
    (BioMed Central, 2021) Yankson Kofi Isaac; Nsiah‑Achampong Kwame Nana; Okyere Paul; Owusu-Dabo Ellis; Afukaar Francis; Otupiri Easmon; Donkor Peter; Mock Charles
    Background: Road construction work has specifc risks and safety issues which have not been adequately addressed in most low- and middle-income countries, especially Africa. The objective of this study was to determine the preva‑ lence of personal protective equipment (PPE) use during road construction activities by workers in foreign- owned against locally-owned road construction companies in Ghana. Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional survey was undertaken during January – March, 2020 to study 389 road construction workers who were actively working on site. They were unobtrusively observed to capture whether or not they wore the appropriate PPE at the time of the survey. The PPE of interest were: hard hat, goggles, shoes, nose masks, hearing protection, gloves and refective vests/apparel. On-site posted PPE signage was also checked. Results: Majority of workers were males (96.9%) and labourers (53.5%). Similar numbers of workers in locally-owned (195) and foreign-owned (194) companies were studied. Use of PPE varied considerably by type: shoes (78.7%), refec‑ tive vest (44.5%), gloves (30.6%), hard hat (27.0%), nose mask (17.2%), goggles (11.3%) and hearing protection (10.8%). For all types of PPE, use was higher for workers in foreign-owned companies compared with locally-owned compa‑ nies: goggles (Odds ratio [OR] 55.2), hearing protection (OR 52.0), gloves (OR 23.7), hard hat (OR 20.2), nose mask (OR 17.8), refective vest (OR 5.3) and shoes (OR 4.1), (p<0.001 for all ORs). No site had any signage to promote PPE use. Conclusions: Majority of workers used shoes. Less than half of workers used other types of PPE and use of some types (goggles and hearing protection) was minimal. Workers in foreign-owned companies were signifcantly more likely to use all the seven types of PPE than locally-owned companies. Although there is still room for improvement in foreign-owned companies, locally-owned companies should be able to attain similar PPE use to that in foreign owned companies. Necessary PPE should be provided and site supervisors should encourage workers to wear PPE when on site.