Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Soku, Francis Atsu"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparative analysis of the effect of transformation techniques on some robust regression measures
    (October 22, 2016) Soku, Francis Atsu
    When the distribution of the errors in a linear model is normal, the OLSE pro- vides reliable parameter estimates for the linear model. When errors deviate from normality, the OLS provides unreliable estimates. This study however evaluated the e ect of transformation techniques on some robust regression measures by comparing four robust regression methods namely M-estimation, MM-estimation, S-estimation and LTS estimation to the OLS estimation using the Mean Absolute Residuals, R2, and Relative e ciencies. Data was simulated and analyzed from a linear model under various situations where the error term has normal distri- bution, lognormal distribution, truncated normal distribution and contaminated normal distribution. The log and Box-Cox transformation were applied to the simulated data before estimating and comparing parameters. The results showed that on the average the robust methods were 2.4% more e cient than the OLSE for the Normal case when no transformation was applied with the exception of the SE which was 10% less e cient. For the lognormal case, the robust methods were 26.9% more e cient under no transformation, 24.5% more e cient under log transformation and 22.8% more e cient under Box-Cox transformation. In the contaminated normal case, the robust methods were 6.3% more e cient under no transformation, 5.8% more e cient under log transformation and 3.8% more e cient under Box-Cox transformation. In the case of the truncated normal, 10% tail truncation resulted in the robust methods being 0.6% more e cient under no transformation and 7.2% more e cient under log and Box-Cox transformation. Increasing the tail truncation to 20% made the robust methods 3.3% more e - cient under no transformation and 10.8% more e cient under log and Box-Cox transformation. Based on the study, it is recommended that, the robust methods should be used when the basic assumptions fail. Also, the Box-Cox transfor- mation technique should be used to linearize data if non-linear relationship is established before using the robust methods.

Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology copyright © 2002-2025