A comparative study of different laboratory storage conditions and DNA extraction methods for enhanced forensic analysis of soil-human blood mixed sample
Loading...
Date
June, 2018
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Crime scene investigation is an important step in the entire criminal investigation process
because this is where evidence is gathered. Blood from the perpetrator or victim of a crime can
be left at crime scenes or transferred to other materials such as clothing, knives and guns. Most
often, this body fluid is contaminated with soil at outdoor crime scenes but this might be the only
or the most important evidence in solving a crime. This study aimed at identifying the most
appropriate method of storing crime scene soil-human blood mixed sample prior to analysis. The
best DNA extraction method for this soil-blood mixed sample was also studied. Three
commercial DNA extraction kits (PrepFiler Forensic DNA Extraction kit, Promega DNA IQ Kit,
Blood Miniprep kit) that have been claimed by the manufacturers to be effective in extracting
DNA from soil contaminated samples were used for the DNA extractions. Hemastix and
Hexagon OBTI kits were used for the serological analysis in this study. Human blood was mixed
with soil and stored at three different storage conditions (i.e., Room temperature/25℃, 4℃ and -
20℃). Hemastix and Hexagon OBTI serological tests for blood and human blood, respectively
were positive for soil-blood mixed samples at all storage conditions throughout the 12 week
study period. Samples stored at room temperature saw significant reduction in DNA
concentration as storage time increased (P=0.001 and 0.0055 for Prepfiler and DNA IQ
extractions, respectively). Samples stored at 4℃ saw a drastic decrease in DNA concentration
just after two weeks of storage. By the eighth week of storage at 4℃, there was no detectable
DNA (P=0.000 for all extraction methods). Samples stored at -20℃ recorded no specific pattern
in decrease or increase in DNA concentration for the entire 12 week storage (P=0.324 and 0.161
for PrepFiler and DNA IQ extractions respectively). The PrepFiler kit yielded more DNA than
the DNA IQ and Blood Miniprep kits at all storage conditions with no significant difference
between PrepFiler and DNA IQ (P=0.603). The PrepFiler kit and DNA IQ kit were successful at
removing possible PCR inhibitors from the soil during DNA extraction with no significant
difference (p=0.887). The Blood Miniprep kit performed poor in terms of removing possible
PCR inhibitors. There were full STR Profiles generated for room temperature stored samples and
-20℃ stored samples extracted with PrepFiler and DNA IQ kits throughout the study. There
were no allele recorded for room temperature stored samples and -20℃ stored samples extracted
with Blood Miniprep kit. There were full, partial and null Profiles generated for 4℃ stored
samples extracted with PrepFiler and DNA IQ kits depending on the sample storage duration.
There were no alleles recorded for 4℃ stored samples extracted with Blood Miniprep kit. In
conclusion, the -20℃ and PrepFiler Forensic DNA extraction kit were identified as the best
storage condition and extraction method, respectively.
Description
This thesis is presented to the Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of an Msc Degree in Forensic Science.