On-site personal protective equipment signage and use by road construction workers in Ghana: a comparative study of foreign and locally-owned companies

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorYankson Kofi Isaac
dc.contributor.authorNsiah‑Achampong Kwame Nana
dc.contributor.authorOkyere Paul
dc.contributor.authorOwusu-Dabo Ellis
dc.contributor.authorAfukaar Francis
dc.contributor.authorOtupiri Easmon
dc.contributor.authorDonkor Peter
dc.contributor.authorMock Charles
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T15:40:24Z
dc.date.available2023-12-11T15:40:24Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionThis article is published by BioMed Central and is also available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12376-2
dc.description.abstractBackground: Road construction work has specifc risks and safety issues which have not been adequately addressed in most low- and middle-income countries, especially Africa. The objective of this study was to determine the preva‑ lence of personal protective equipment (PPE) use during road construction activities by workers in foreign- owned against locally-owned road construction companies in Ghana. Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional survey was undertaken during January – March, 2020 to study 389 road construction workers who were actively working on site. They were unobtrusively observed to capture whether or not they wore the appropriate PPE at the time of the survey. The PPE of interest were: hard hat, goggles, shoes, nose masks, hearing protection, gloves and refective vests/apparel. On-site posted PPE signage was also checked. Results: Majority of workers were males (96.9%) and labourers (53.5%). Similar numbers of workers in locally-owned (195) and foreign-owned (194) companies were studied. Use of PPE varied considerably by type: shoes (78.7%), refec‑ tive vest (44.5%), gloves (30.6%), hard hat (27.0%), nose mask (17.2%), goggles (11.3%) and hearing protection (10.8%). For all types of PPE, use was higher for workers in foreign-owned companies compared with locally-owned compa‑ nies: goggles (Odds ratio [OR] 55.2), hearing protection (OR 52.0), gloves (OR 23.7), hard hat (OR 20.2), nose mask (OR 17.8), refective vest (OR 5.3) and shoes (OR 4.1), (p<0.001 for all ORs). No site had any signage to promote PPE use. Conclusions: Majority of workers used shoes. Less than half of workers used other types of PPE and use of some types (goggles and hearing protection) was minimal. Workers in foreign-owned companies were signifcantly more likely to use all the seven types of PPE than locally-owned companies. Although there is still room for improvement in foreign-owned companies, locally-owned companies should be able to attain similar PPE use to that in foreign owned companies. Necessary PPE should be provided and site supervisors should encourage workers to wear PPE when on site.
dc.description.sponsorshipKNUST
dc.identifier.citationYankson et al. BMC Public Health (2021) 21:2321 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12376-2
dc.identifier.uri10.1186/s12889-021-12376-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.knust.edu.gh/handle/123456789/14774
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.titleOn-site personal protective equipment signage and use by road construction workers in Ghana: a comparative study of foreign and locally-owned companies
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
On-site personal protective equipment signage and use by road construction workers in Ghna.pdf
Size:
923.24 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Articles