Why “formal” climate adaptation strategies fail in sub-Saharan Africa: Ignoring adapters’ agency in the case of smallholding agriculture farming practices in Bono East Region of Ghana

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorQuarshie Tetteh Philip
dc.contributor.authorAbdul-Abdulai Rahim
dc.contributor.authorAbdulai Abdulai
dc.contributor.authorAntwi- Agyei Philip
dc.contributor.authorFraser D. G. Evan
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8599-474X
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-18T14:48:04Z
dc.date.available2023-12-18T14:48:04Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionThis article is published by RMets and is also available at https://doi.org/10.1002/cli2.53
dc.description.abstractThis paper reviewed a body of literature on climate adaptation options in sub- Saharan Africa’s (SSA) smallholding agriculture and complemented it with a case study involving experts interviews, focus group discussions, large-scale household surveys, and farmer practices observation while drawing insight from the concept of “everyday adaptation and interrupted agency” and agency theory to assess farmer perceived limitations with climate-smart agriculture (CSA) and climate-wise food systems (CWFS) practices for climate adaptation in the SSA. The study noted that the narrow focus on CSA and/or CWFS as a silver bullet for climate change adaptation suitable for smallholding agriculture ignores food producers’ agency to undermine sustainable and inclusive adaptation solutions. Moreover, smallholder farmers’ everyday climate adaptation practices could be grouped into three categories; on-farm adaptation, off-farm adaptation, and Indigenous agroecological adaptation options. The on-farm adaptation options are usually agriculture intensification and extensification. The off-farm adaptation options include livelihood diversification activities, petty trading, seasonal labor jobs, and migration. The Indigenous agroecological adaptation strategy uses observing nature and weather elements to predict the onset of This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the
dc.description.sponsorshipKNUST
dc.identifier.citationhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cli2.53
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/cli2.53
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.knust.edu.gh/handle/123456789/14930
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRMets
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDOI: 10.1002/cli2.53; DOI: 10.1002/cli2.53
dc.titleWhy “formal” climate adaptation strategies fail in sub-Saharan Africa: Ignoring adapters’ agency in the case of smallholding agriculture farming practices in Bono East Region of Ghana
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Climate Resilience - 2023 - Quarshie - Why formal climate adaptation strategies fail in sub‐Saharan Africa Ignoring.pdf
Size:
2.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Articles