Modified Holling Tanner diffusive and non-diffusive predator–prey models: The impact of prey refuge and fear effect

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorTripathi, Deepak
dc.contributor.authorTripathi, Jai Prakash
dc.contributor.authorTiwari, Satish Kumar
dc.contributor.authorJana, Debaldev
dc.contributor.authorHou, Li-Feng
dc.contributor.authorShi, Yu
dc.contributor.authorSun, Gui-Quan
dc.contributor.authorTiwari, Vandana
dc.contributor.authorAsamoah, Joshua Kiddy K.
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7066-246X
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-21T09:25:04Z
dc.date.available2024-11-21T09:25:04Z
dc.date.issued2024-09
dc.descriptionThis article is published by Elsevier 2024 and is also available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107995
dc.description.abstractThe secondary consequences of predator species on prey species have substantial implications for population dynamics. A deeper comprehension of the dynamics between prey and predator can be achieved through the examination of indirect consequences. This work examines the dynamic behavior of a modified Holling-Tanner model. The interactions between the species are characterized by a functional response of the Beddington– DeAngelis type. Factors such as prey refuge, fear factor, disturbance intensity, and cross diffusion have been taken into account. The boundedness, feasibility of equilibrium points, their stability and restrictions for Hopf bifurcation of non-spatial model system are derived. The study explores the combined effects of prey refuge presence and fear factors on population dynamics. Furthermore, the investigation focuses on the stability of spatial self-diffusion and cross-diffusion model systems, as well as the specific conditions that lead to Turing instability. Ultimately, it has been shown that in the context of self-diffusion, a moderate level of fear promotes the survival of prey, whereas an excessive level of dread hinders the survival of prey. Concurrently, the mean density of prey exhibited a gradual decline as the refuge parameters increased. The spatial patterns of the population have also been investigated. As the mutual interference between prey populations intensifies, the spatial distribution of the prey population transitions from a clustered pattern to a combination of striped and clustered patterns, ultimately settling into a striped pattern. With the gradual growth of the half saturation constant, the prey population reached a state of uniform distribution. In the scenario of cross diffusion, when the prey is heavily impacted by the pursuit of predators, the fear effect, when appropriately used, did not have a significant impact on the survival of the prey. This work adds to the existing body of knowledge by revealing novel insights into the influence of indirect factors on the behavior of predator and prey populations.
dc.description.sponsorshipKNUST
dc.identifier.citationResults in Physics 65 (2024) 107995
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107995
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.knust.edu.gh/handle/123456789/15996
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.titleModified Holling Tanner diffusive and non-diffusive predator–prey models: The impact of prey refuge and fear effect
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
paper2024(13).pdf
Size:
4.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Articles